Skip to content

CISA Fact Sheet

Exam Logistics

Item Detail
Exam Code CISA
Format Linear, fixed-form, computer-based
Duration 4 hours (240 minutes)
Question Count 150 multiple-choice
Passing Score 450 / 800 (scaled)
Cost (USD) $575 ISACA member / $760 non-member
Languages English, Chinese (Simplified), French, German, Hebrew, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Spanish, Turkish
Delivery PSI test centers OR online-proctored
Retake Wait 1st: 30 days; 2nd-3rd: 90 days; 4th: 6 months. Max 4 attempts in 12 months.
Validity 3-year CPE cycle
Maintenance 120 CPE / 3 years (20 CPE/yr min) + $45/yr AMF (member) / $85/yr (non-member)
Application Window 5 years from exam pass date to apply for certification

Domain Weights (Current Job Practice)

Domain Weight Approx. Questions
1. Information System Auditing Process 21% ~32
2. Governance and Management of IT 17% ~26
3. IS Acquisition, Development, and Implementation 12% ~18
4. IS Operations and Business Resilience 23% ~35
5. Protection of Information Assets 27% ~40

Eligibility and Substitutions

Path Requirement
Standard 5 years of professional IS audit, control, or security work experience
1 year IS experience OR non-IS audit -1 year (max 1)
2-year associate's degree -1 year
4-year bachelor's degree -2 years
Master's degree (ISACA-accredited university) in IS or IT -1 additional year (combined max 3)
2 years full-time university instructor in related field -1 year
Pass exam without experience OK; 5-year window to verify experience

Audit Lifecycle (ITAF-Aligned)

The IS audit process per ITAF (Information Technology Audit Framework):

  1. Audit Planning - audit charter, audit universe, risk assessment, annual audit plan
  2. Risk Assessment - identify risks per auditable unit; prioritize engagements
  3. Engagement Planning - scope, objectives, criteria, resources, timing
  4. Fieldwork / Execution - control identification, walkthroughs, testing (compliance and substantive)
  5. Reporting - findings, recommendations, management response, audit opinion
  6. Follow-up - validate remediation; close findings or escalate

Audit Standards Hierarchy (ITAF)

Tier Document Authority
Tier 1 Standards Mandatory; "must" or "shall" language
Tier 2 Guidelines Recommended; "should" language; explain how to apply standards
Tier 3 Tools and Techniques Optional; provide examples and templates

CISA candidates must know that ITAF Standards are mandatory for ISACA members performing IS audits.

Types of Audits

Type Purpose
Financial audit Validates financial statements
Operational audit Evaluates effectiveness/efficiency of operations
Integrated audit Combines financial + operational + IT
Compliance audit Validates adherence to laws, regs, contracts
Forensic audit Investigates fraud, litigation support
IS audit Validates IT systems, controls, governance
SOC 1 (SSAE 18, ISAE 3402) Controls relevant to financial reporting
SOC 2 (Type 1: design; Type 2: design + operating effectiveness) Trust Services Criteria (security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, privacy)
SOC 3 Public-facing summary of SOC 2
Pre/post-implementation review Before or after deploying a system
Administrative audit Verifies operational policies/procedures

Types of Controls

Classification Examples
By Function Preventive (firewall, encryption), Detective (logs, IDS), Corrective (backup restore), Recovery (DR site), Deterrent (warning banner), Compensating (manager review for SoD)
By Implementation Administrative (policy, training), Technical/Logical (ACL, encryption), Physical (locks, guards)
By Origin General controls (org-wide: change mgmt, access mgmt, BCP) vs Application controls (input/process/output edits in a specific app)
By Audit Approach Compliance testing (control exists and is followed) vs Substantive testing (data is accurate / transactions are valid)

Compliance vs Substantive Testing

  • Compliance testing - tests whether controls operated as designed. Example: sample 25 user access requests to verify each has manager approval.
  • Substantive testing - tests whether data is materially accurate. Example: recalculate interest on a sample of loans.

If compliance testing reveals control failures, expand substantive testing.

Sampling Methods

Method Purpose
Statistical sampling Each item has a known, non-zero probability of selection; results are mathematically projectable to the population
Non-statistical (judgmental) Auditor selects based on judgment; not projectable
Attribute sampling Tests rate of compliance with a control (yes/no exists). Used in compliance testing.
Variable sampling Tests numerical accuracy (dollar amounts). Used in substantive testing.
Stop-or-go sampling Halts when low error rate is confirmed early
Discovery sampling Tests for at least one occurrence of a critical anomaly (e.g., fraud)
Frequency-estimating Estimates how often an attribute occurs in the population

Key sampling terms: - Population - complete set of items - Sample size - influenced by confidence level, expected error rate, tolerable error rate - Confidence coefficient (level) - typically 90-95% - Tolerable error rate - max acceptable rate of deviation - Expected error rate - auditor's prior expectation - Sampling risk - sample does not represent population

Audit Evidence Hierarchy (Reliability)

From most to least reliable:

  1. Auditor's direct observation / re-performance (most reliable)
  2. Externally generated documents addressed to auditor (e.g., bank confirmations)
  3. Externally generated documents in client's possession
  4. Internally generated documents from a strong control environment
  5. Internally generated documents from a weak control environment
  6. Oral evidence / management representation (least reliable)

Evidence types: documentary, observational, analytical, oral, electronic (CAATs output), physical.

Audit Evidence Quality Criteria

  • Sufficiency - enough quantity to support conclusion
  • Reliability - source and method of collection
  • Relevance - directly addresses audit objective
  • Usefulness - helps achieve the engagement objective

Risk Formulas

  • Inherent Risk (IR) - risk before considering controls
  • Control Risk (CR) - risk a control fails to detect/prevent
  • Detection Risk (DR) - risk auditor fails to detect a material misstatement
  • Audit Risk (AR) = IR x CR x DR
  • Residual Risk = Inherent Risk - effect of Controls

The auditor cannot directly influence IR or CR but can adjust DR by changing the nature, timing, and extent of testing. Lower acceptable AR -> more substantive testing -> larger sample sizes.

Quantitative Risk (Same as CISSP)

  • SLE = Asset Value x Exposure Factor
  • ALE = SLE x ARO
  • Cost-benefit = ALE before - ALE after - Annualized Cost of Safeguard
  • ROSI (Return on Security Investment) = (ALE reduction - Cost) / Cost

COBIT 2019 Core

COBIT 2019 separates governance (set direction, monitor) from management (plan, build, run, monitor).

Governance Objectives Domain (5 objectives, EDM)

  • EDM = Evaluate, Direct, and Monitor
  • EDM01 Ensured Governance Framework Setting and Maintenance
  • EDM02 Ensured Benefits Delivery
  • EDM03 Ensured Risk Optimization
  • EDM04 Ensured Resource Optimization
  • EDM05 Ensured Stakeholder Engagement

Management Objectives Domains (35 objectives, APO + BAI + DSS + MEA)

  • APO (Align, Plan, and Organize) - 14 objectives
  • BAI (Build, Acquire, and Implement) - 11 objectives
  • DSS (Deliver, Service, and Support) - 6 objectives
  • MEA (Monitor, Evaluate, and Assess) - 4 objectives

COBIT 2019 Components (Enablers)

  1. Processes
  2. Organizational structures
  3. Information flows
  4. People, skills, and competencies
  5. Culture, ethics, and behavior
  6. Services, infrastructure, and applications
  7. Principles, policies, and frameworks

Six Governance System Principles

  1. Provide stakeholder value
  2. Holistic approach
  3. Dynamic governance system
  4. Governance distinct from management
  5. Tailored to enterprise needs
  6. End-to-end governance system

Key Frameworks (Memorize)

Framework Origin Focus
COBIT 2019 ISACA IT governance and management
ITAF ISACA IS audit standards/guidelines
ISO/IEC 27001 ISO/IEC ISMS (Information Security Management System)
ISO/IEC 27002 ISO/IEC Security controls catalog (companion to 27001)
ISO/IEC 27005 ISO/IEC Information security risk management
ISO/IEC 27017 ISO/IEC Cloud security controls
ISO/IEC 27018 ISO/IEC Cloud privacy (PII processors)
ISO/IEC 27701 ISO/IEC PIMS (privacy management)
ISO/IEC 38500 ISO/IEC Corporate governance of IT
ISO/IEC 31000 ISO/IEC General risk management
ITIL 4 AXELOS IT service management
NIST CSF 2.0 NIST Cybersecurity framework (Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover)
NIST SP 800-53 NIST Security and privacy controls (federal)
NIST SP 800-37 NIST Risk Management Framework (RMF)
NIST SP 800-30 NIST Risk assessment
NIST SP 800-61 NIST Incident handling
NIST SP 800-115 NIST Security testing and assessment
NIST SP 800-88 NIST Media sanitization
COSO ICIF (2013) COSO Internal control over financial reporting
COSO ERM (2017) COSO Enterprise risk management
TOGAF The Open Group Enterprise architecture
Zachman Zachman Inst. Enterprise architecture taxonomy
CMMI ISACA/SEI Capability maturity (5 levels)
PMBOK / PRINCE2 PMI / AXELOS Project management
FAIR Open Group Quantitative risk

ISO 27001 Annex A (2022 Revision)

The 93 controls in Annex A of ISO/IEC 27001:2022 are organized into 4 themes (down from 14 domains in the 2013 version):

Theme Controls Examples
5. Organizational 37 Policies, roles, threat intel, supplier relationships, incident management
6. People 8 Screening, terms of employment, awareness, disciplinary process
7. Physical 14 Physical perimeters, secure areas, equipment, clear desk
8. Technological 34 Access control, cryptography, secure development, network controls, monitoring

NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 Control Families (20)

AC, AT, AU, CA, CM, CP, IA, IR, MA, MP, PE, PL, PM, PS, PT, RA, SA, SC, SI, SR.

Family Name
AC Access Control
AT Awareness and Training
AU Audit and Accountability
CA Assessment, Authorization, and Monitoring
CM Configuration Management
CP Contingency Planning
IA Identification and Authentication
IR Incident Response
MA Maintenance
MP Media Protection
PE Physical and Environmental Protection
PL Planning
PM Program Management
PS Personnel Security
PT PII Processing and Transparency
RA Risk Assessment
SA System and Services Acquisition
SC System and Communications Protection
SI System and Information Integrity
SR Supply Chain Risk Management

COSO Internal Control - Integrated Framework (5 Components)

  1. Control Environment (tone at the top)
  2. Risk Assessment
  3. Control Activities
  4. Information and Communication
  5. Monitoring Activities

Mnemonic: CRIME (Control env, Risk, Info, Monitoring, control activitiEs).

SDLC Phases (Generic Waterfall, CISA Domain 3)

  1. Feasibility study (cost-benefit, risk, alternatives)
  2. Requirements definition
  3. Design (logical and physical)
  4. Development (coding)
  5. Testing (unit, integration, system, UAT, regression)
  6. Implementation (deployment, conversion, training)
  7. Post-implementation review (was the business case realized?)

Testing Types

Test Purpose
Unit Smallest testable component
Integration Modules together
System Entire application
UAT (User Acceptance) End-user validation against business requirements
Regression New changes did not break existing functions
Performance / Stress / Load Behavior under load
Volume Large data quantities
Recovery System recovery after failure
Security / Penetration Vulnerabilities
Parallel Old and new run side-by-side, compare results
Pilot Subset of users on new system
Black box No knowledge of internals
White box Full knowledge
Gray box Partial knowledge

Cutover (Implementation) Strategies

  • Direct (big-bang) - cut over instantly; highest risk
  • Parallel - old and new run together; safest, costliest
  • Phased - module by module; balanced
  • Pilot - one location/group first; localized risk

BCP/DR Recovery Metrics (Same as CISSP)

  • RTO - Max acceptable downtime
  • RPO - Max acceptable data loss
  • MTD / MTPD - Maximum Tolerable Downtime; RTO must be less
  • WRT - Work Recovery Time (data restore + validation after RTO)
  • MTTR - Mean Time to Repair
  • MTBF - Mean Time Between Failures
  • SDO - Service Delivery Objective (degraded service level during DR)
  • MTO - Maximum Tolerable Outage in alternate process mode

RTO + WRT must fit within MTD.

Recovery Sites

Site Cost Setup Time Notes
Cold Lowest Weeks Empty space, utilities only
Warm Medium Days Partial equipment, no current data
Hot High Hours Fully operational, current data
Mirrored / Mobile Highest Real-time Active-active, near-zero RTO/RPO
Reciprocal/Mutual aid Lowest Days Agreement with another org
Cloud DR (DRaaS) Variable Hours Pay-as-you-go

Backup Schemes

Scheme What is backed up Restore complexity
Full Everything 1 tape
Incremental Changes since last backup of any type Last full + all incrementals
Differential Changes since last full Last full + last differential
Mirror Real-time replica Immediate
GFS (Grandfather-Father-Son) Tiered rotation Standard enterprise approach

DR Test Types (Least to Most Disruptive)

  1. Read-through (checklist)
  2. Walk-through (structured discussion)
  3. Tabletop (scenario-based discussion)
  4. Simulation (operational exercise; no real failover)
  5. Parallel (alternate site processes in parallel with prod)
  6. Full interruption (production fails over to alternate; highest risk, highest realism)

Network Devices and OSI Layers

Device Layer Function
Hub 1 Repeats signal
Switch 2 Forwards frames by MAC
Router 3 Routes packets by IP
Firewall 3-7 Filters traffic
WAF 7 Filters HTTP(S)
IDS/IPS 3-7 Detects/prevents intrusions
Proxy 7 Acts as intermediary
Load balancer 4 or 7 Distributes load

Identity and Access Models

  • DAC - owner-controlled (Windows ACLs)
  • MAC - system-enforced labels (military, SELinux)
  • RBAC - permissions via roles
  • ABAC - attribute-based rules
  • RuBAC - rule-based (firewalls)

Cryptography Cheat Sheet

Algorithm Type Key Length Notes
AES Symmetric 128/192/256 NIST standard
3DES Symmetric 168 (eff. 112) Deprecated
RSA Asymmetric 2048+ Key exchange + signing
ECC Asymmetric 256+ Smaller keys, equivalent strength
DH/ECDH Key agreement 2048+ / 256+ PFS when ephemeral
SHA-256 / SHA-3 Hash 256 Current standards
MD5, SHA-1 Hash Deprecated Collision-vulnerable
HMAC MAC Variable Authenticated integrity
bcrypt, scrypt, Argon2, PBKDF2 Password hash Variable Use for password storage

Common Audit Findings (Severity Levels)

Severity Description Example
Critical / High Could cause significant loss; immediate action No segregation of duties in payments
Medium Material weakness; remediate near-term Quarterly access reviews missing
Low Minor; remediate per management plan Documentation gaps
Observation / Recommendation Not a finding; improvement opportunity Strengthen monitoring

Finding Structure (5 C's)

A well-written audit finding contains:

  1. Criteria - the standard / requirement (policy, regulation, framework)
  2. Condition - what was observed
  3. Cause - why the condition exists
  4. Consequence - the impact / risk
  5. Corrective action (recommendation) - what management should do

ISACA Code of Professional Ethics (Memorize)

ISACA members and certification holders shall:

  1. Support the implementation of and encourage compliance with appropriate standards, procedures, and controls.
  2. Perform their duties with objectivity, due diligence, and professional care, in accordance with professional standards.
  3. Serve in the interest of stakeholders in a lawful manner, while maintaining high standards of conduct and not engaging in acts discreditable to the profession or association.
  4. Maintain the privacy and confidentiality of information obtained in the course of duties unless disclosure is required by legal authority. Such information shall not be used for personal benefit nor released to inappropriate parties.
  5. Maintain competency in their respective fields and undertake only those activities they can reasonably expect to complete with the necessary skills, knowledge, and competence.
  6. Inform appropriate parties of the results of work performed, including the disclosure of all significant facts known to them that, if not disclosed, may distort the reporting of the results.
  7. Support the professional education of stakeholders in enhancing their understanding of the governance and management of enterprise IT, including audit, control, and security.

The exam tests application of these canons. When in doubt, prioritize objectivity, confidentiality, and competence.

Independence

  • Independence in fact - actual freedom from bias
  • Independence in appearance - perception of objectivity to outsiders

Independence applies to: - The audit function (organizational placement, ideally reporting to audit committee or board) - The individual auditor (no involvement in design/operation of audited area)

If independence is impaired, the auditor must disclose and may need to recuse.

Audit Charter

A foundational document approved by the board / audit committee that: - Establishes audit's authority and scope - Confirms reporting line (audit committee) - Establishes independence - Defines responsibilities

The audit charter is the FIRST artifact for any internal audit function and is required by ITAF.

CAATs (Computer-Assisted Audit Techniques)

Tools auditors use to test electronically: - Generalized audit software (ACL, IDEA) - read, analyze, sample data - Test data / Integrated test facility (ITF) - submit test transactions through production code - Parallel simulation - re-perform processing with auditor's logic; compare to production - Embedded audit modules / SCARF (Systems Control Audit Review File) - real-time monitoring of transactions - Snapshots - capture state of data at points in time - Mapping / Tracing - follow execution paths

CAATs increase efficiency and enable 100% population testing on large datasets.

Privacy Regulations (Domain 5 / Domain 2 Overlap)

  • GDPR (EU) - DPO, DPIA, 72-hour breach notification, $20M / 4% global turnover fines
  • CCPA / CPRA (California) - opt-out, opt-in for under 16
  • HIPAA (US) - PHI, BAA, breach notification 60 days
  • GLBA (US financial) - Safeguards Rule, Privacy Rule
  • SOX (US public companies) - Section 302/404, IT general controls
  • PCI DSS v4.0 (payment cards) - 12 requirements; contractual not legal
  • PIPEDA (Canada), LGPD (Brazil), POPIA (South Africa), APPI (Japan)
  • ISACA CISA page: https://www.isaca.org/credentialing/cisa
  • CISA exam content outline: https://www.isaca.org/credentialing/cisa/cisa-exam-content-outline
  • ITAF: https://www.isaca.org/resources/itaf
  • COBIT 2019: https://www.isaca.org/resources/cobit
  • NIST publications: https://csrc.nist.gov/publications
  • ISO standards catalog: https://www.iso.org/standards.html
  • COSO: https://www.coso.org

CPE Categories (ISACA)

CPEs may be earned via: ISACA chapter meetings, conferences (ISACA, RSA, BlackHat), webinars, ISACA Journal articles, vendor training, college courses, teaching, exam authoring, mentoring, publication. The ISACA portal tracks CPEs in real time. Audit retention: 12 months past the reporting cycle.

Quick Mnemonic Reference

  • 5 C's of findings - Criteria, Condition, Cause, Consequence, Corrective action
  • CRIME (COSO) - Control env, Risk assessment, Info & communication, Monitoring, control activitiEs
  • EDM-APO-BAI-DSS-MEA (COBIT 2019) - the 5 domains
  • PDCA (ISO 27001) - Plan, Do, Check, Act
  • NIST CSF 2.0 - Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover (GIPDRR)